Gnizmo on 29 August 2009
| zexen_lowe said: Yeah, that's what I think, the majority has decided that...but I think we should change our votes, then, to make it clear, to a "no-lynch vote", right? Because it's not the same abstaining as voting to lynch no one |
If we want to play the semantics game then yes you would want no-lynch. Alternatively it could just be a set rule that abstain means no lynch. So long as it is spelled out before it would affect the reults, and remains constant regardless across the days there should be no issue.
