By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KylieDog said:
Zones said:
SHMUPGurus said:

What holes? You sound just like KylieDog here (a member at VGC).

 

Oh god, please don't compare me to KylieDog; he pretty much hates everything he doesn't find interesting. I remember him calling the story of MGS4 and MGS2 a joke.

 

 

I am highly critical of things, that does not mean I hate them.

 

I will not list the various reasons and examples why the stories are bad again, but just state in short, they are badly told and full of plotholes, large story elements left hanging and have major inconsistancies, like the story was set-up for one direction in one game and then faced a complete cop-out of that direction in the follow ups.

Problem with you is that you usually criticise and judge things through your own perspective, but you show them like facts. I mean I remember seeing you 'trolling' in almost every Killzone 2 topics around when the game launched because you had issues with how the game controls, yet millions have no issue with that.

For some reason you hate Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 and like World At War and I don't think that can be justified considering WaW is simply a rip-off of the first MW, so I don't understand your point of view here. You also want to prove how Battlefield is superior to Call of Duty because CoD is easier to handle.

About MGS and on topic, I actually agree with what you said here. I think story-wise, both MGS2 and MGS4 under-deliver. The reason I believe is that Kojima never wanted to write/direct these games, while he had wanted to write and direct the other two. But I don't think it's justified in any way to call them 'joke' considering that around 90% of videogames don't even have a story at all. There are many well thought out story parts throughout the games, and I believe MGS is the most sophisticated story ever told in gaming, so flaws can be expected more.