By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sega4life said:
COKTOE said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:
"Our philosophy this generation was to not make people pay for things that they weren't going to use."

Before I get flamed....Thanks MS RRoD was a lot fun!

But he is completely right!!


Is pumpkin-head talking about Blu-Ray, the web-browser, and Wi-Fi? If the Slim and old PS3 fats are now the same cost as an 360 Elite then your not paying more, your paying the same and getting more. And then there's the ridiclulous cost of the MS proprietery hard-drives and wi-fi adapters one could "choose" to buy, just to bring the 360 more up to spec. Only without Blu-Ray, a web browser and a $50 a year P2P service. All in one console that will fail you repeatedly.

Kinda of reminds you of last gen huh?

I mean one had more to offer then the other, but one sold more because it had a larger selection of games, and was out first of course..


Much truth. I had both the PS2 ansd XBOX1 (Cube too). I would say the the disparity in game library size was much bigger for PS2/XBOX than it is for 360/PS3 though. For the record (again) the XBOX was my fave system last-gen, and I loved what if offered out of the box. And (again) I did own a 360. In fact said ownership as well as my continued....hmmm...disgust(?) with the MS way of doing buisness is why i will never own a MS console again.



- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."