Rath said:
You said that giving people a million each for a house was bad therefore giving people money to buy whiteware was bad. Its a fallacy of extension, a strawman, you were attacking a different thing than the subject matter. The cash for clunkers program should with any luck have implications for the US auto industry, the wider economy and the environment. If its succesful then it will have been well worth the money spent.
But yes, a super-grid will probably be needed in the USA. You could easily build large renewable stations (that take up a lot of land area) in the Mid-West where nobody actually lives, the problem is getting it out of there. |
It should have the effect of frontloading sales.
I wouldn't be surprised if car sales started rapidly dropping off as sales were just pushed foward.
The new credit wasn't enough to stop people from buying used in my opinion. So all it really did was motivate the base that was already going to buy new.
What they should of did with Cash for Clunkers is
A) Limit it to American car companies.
B) Limit it to hyrbids and other electric vehicles.
It does the same things but it decreases oil use while increasing electricity production. A lot of cash for clunkers money went to SUVs.
For this appliance once... I don't know what you could do to make it a good idea.








