| dawve24 said: Its a shame when opposition parties use it as a way to attack a government who is following laws that they themselves have used. While most in Scotland could agree with the Scottish elements of the unionist parties having an input. David Cameron etc have no say on internel scottish law and should not be stirring this up in the rest of the UK. This was a scots decision and if the majority of us decide we don't like it the Nationalists won't be in power after the next election. |
Well that's very much ignoring the outside pressure that was put on them to reach this decision doesn't it?
Afterall there is a lot of proof pointing to the fact that the only reasons they were really considering it were negotiations between Momar Quaddaffi and Gordon Brown... along with other Libyian inroads to people.
This all happened soley because Libya wanted it to happen. It had nothing to do with the law.
It's no more "right" lawfully then when some US president pardons his friends. The US president has the right to pardon people... but when he uses that position to pay back friends or help an agenda...
It does leave him up for criticism.
I mean if Barak Obama suddenly pardoned Charls Manson or some other derranged serial killer. It would be well within the legal system and his right to do so...
still I think people would be upset.
