By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Cthulhu said:
heruamon said:
Cthulhu said:
Actually the article is not negative but people will always find ways on making it look bad

Two takes on the article...there's ALOT of people out there with mis-information about were the PS3 is...it's not profitable, and Kaz clearly and explicitly stated it...so, until he restates it, hopefully we won't get anymore nonsense post.

The second thing is that sony, at least Kaz, is letting investors know where the PS brand sits...good move.

Well only an idiot or a die hard fanboy would think the PS3slim (the device) after 100bucks off would be profitable. But I remember in past generations it was the same (more or less). You lose on hardware, you win on software or from other sources.

And Sony being honest is a good move

I've already been warned about using the term "fanboy", but I think there were some who believed the PS3 was making money...notice Kaz said gross...not net.  the PS3 as a platform isn't profitable yet...they have some potential big games from internal studios, which might offset the $100 drop...but look at M$...even with the boost to consoles, and the increased amount of software sales...revenues are still down, and probably won't recover until this year with ODST.



"...You can't kill ideas with a sword, and you can't sink belief structures with a broadside. You defeat them by making them change..."

- From By Schism Rent Asunder