nightsurge said:
No I do not, but do you know the definition of a theory? They have no solid proof for most theories. They have ideas and possible explanations. They base the big bang theory solely on some conception that since space can be seen to expand from a central point, it must have started out there... even without instrumentation that can prove what they are seeing. It could be they are comparing the expansion of our own galaxy to a much larger center of gravity that is not the center of the universe. I also love how they even guess at the elements which somehow existed before nothing and somehow combined in a surge of energy to create the universe. Energy cannot be created nor destroyed, only transfered... so where did the immense energy come from that could create a bang large enough to create the universe? Also, things like carbon dating have been found many times over to be extremely flawed at determining the age of things. Scientists all give estimates which are nothing more than educated guesses at what they think explains things. There's just as much proof to religious stories from the Bible as there is for any scientific explanation of the beginning times.... |
actually that was solved a lng time ago, here i'll explain: there are ten spacial dimension(Humans can only percive 3) and one time dimension, atleast that was what physisit thought until seaching from the beggining of all, they discover other universe, living paralell to ours but in spaces we couldn't percive, and in this long oddysey it was discovers all universes are born and contained in the same place, a fiber so tiny it cannot be percived yet so universal to hold everything, thats the eleventh dimension. thats as far as i know, but all universes are born there, evaporate there and contained there.








