I find the outrage over Vick's reinstatement gratuitous. In 1998, Leonard Little killed a woman because he was driving drunk. He was suspended for eight games by the NFL and was sentenced to 90 days in jail, four years of probation, and 1000 hours of community service. Michael Vick pleads guilty to financing dog fighting, and he is sentenced to 23 months in federal prison and is essentially suspended for six games upon his release. Where is the outrage over Little's reinstatement? Why are people not upset that he received a second chance? I love animals, especially dogs, but we the punishment must be commensurate to the crime. Vick's punishment was, ostensibly, commensurate to the crime. Vick received his punishment; we must stop punishing him.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
