i have always thought, critism in any manner is just a way to reassure the buyer, something like a body to existance.
the thing is, most videogames critics or critics of anything, critizise sometheing they don't work at or have expirience doing, for example i can bet you a thousand bucks mark bozon from ign has never done a mario galaxy. one thing is having knowledge about things and the other one is the expirience of doing it and the reasons for doing it. critics don't know why certain developers take certains path. critisicsm has being around since the times of acient greece, but what are critics if not people who make a living from judging the works of other while the themselves dont do a thing. a worker and a speaker.
critics any way, just give their opinion out, despite some of them actually believing themselves to be actual universal judgemnt gods, so people should take reviews lightly.
