mai said:
So in other words you failed to proof your point, i.e. "anyways, Kutaragi is soooo more important. It's not even up for debate. He made video games more than a kids toy." - and just said to me that I need to stfu? How nice of you! Should I support my point with data? Why not: http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/4th-qtr-2008-console-gender-usage-abridged.pdf ? |
You just proved my point. According to your documents the highest average days of usage is in the 18-24 age group. Which is not kids.
Not only that but it's common knowledge. Sony made europe as big a video game market as america whereas previously it was only about a third. Sony made the playstation a icon that you could have in the living room where other consoles were concidered toys and were in the kids bedrooms.
If you want to i suggest watching the playstation retrospective over on youtube or visiting wikipedia.
The reason i asked you not to post is because I don't really feel like accomplishing nothing. At the end of the day nomatter how many posts we retaliate against eachother with (if you can call it that) we'll both leave and think we're right. That's how it works. And i've done it enough times that i can't be arsed to anymore.
@Claude. Again you contradict your signature and I suggest you stop with your baseless accusations as you're clearly the one in denial.







