Aritcle/Analysis: Sony screws up with new PS3 (40 GB)

Sony - Aritcle/Analysis: Sony screws up with new PS3 (40 GB) - View Post

MikeB

Currently Offline

7,925

5594 posts since 01/02/07

Recent Badges:

2 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 2 years.
10 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 10 years.
Open For Business Earned 10 badges.
Site Veteran Has been a VGChartz member for over 5 years.
Making Friends 10 friends on gamrConnect.
15 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 15 years.

Currently Playing:

God of War III (PS3)
Heavy Rain (PS3)
Uncharted 2: Among Thieves (PS3)

MikeB on 22 October 2007

@ HappySqurriel

I prefer Sony to focuss on the long term perspective, I think the choice for Blu-Ray was really a no brainer considering the PS3's specifications (memory, bandwidth & performance), within which a higher capacity drive suits very well (like DVD was for the PS2). I also think Sony and other companies have far more long term plans for the Cell design processors well beyond just the PS3, I'm sure they evaluated both the short term and long term gains for the company.

I am most happy with the fact the PS3 has a Blu-Ray drive, but especially with the inclusion of the Cell processor.

Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."

PS3 vs 360 sales

Delete Shortcut Create Shortcut
View Post

Existing User Log In

New User Registration

Sony - Aritcle/Analysis: Sony screws up with new PS3 (40 GB) - View Post

Recent Badges:

Currently Playing:

Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."