Rath said:
You know, you still haven't actually answered his accusation that you are posting a false dilemma. Also your accusation that Squilliam wants something for nothing is unfounded (I certainly don't want something for nothing, as I will be a professional when I graduate I will in fact be paying more money in taxes than I get back in services - I still want a more socialist system) and telling him to move to Europe and get the hell out of your sight is hardly mature debating. In fact its just borderline flaming. I would also rather that 100% of the population got good healthcare from the government than that 90% of the population got very good healthcare and 10% of the population got extremely poor healthcare (in fact more than 10% of the population does not have health insurance, but anyway). |
100% of Americans have healthcare, it's just only 90% have health insurance. Of the ones that don't have insurance, 50% of them are under the age of 30, with 70% of them working full time. So, for a lot of the 10% that don't have insurance, it's by choice.
And I would rather have more that I can earn, then anything given to me. If I lived under Norway's system, I would not have the ability to have the life I have here.
Oh, and I was not telling Squill to get out of my sight, it was directed to "random American who wants something for nothing".







