Kasz216 said:
A) Both are choices people make and something that should be up to them. B) That in my opinion is facist thinking. Someone losing sick time due to the effects of smoking is no different then someone "losing" time because they decide to not go into work in a day. The government has no "right" to any time I don't go to work, no matter the reason. Penalizing me for not working is at best light facism. I mean why not tax people more who go on vacation? C) Yeah that's... social engineering. Which is wrong. Your telling people "You arent responsible enough to stop smoking and drinking. So we the government are going to stop you... or make you damn well feel it anyway! This is immoral. If someone wants to do something unhealthy they should have every right to do it. We should treat adults... like adults. |
A) One is a cultural and religious choice with profound spiritual effects on a persons life. One is a way to slowly kill yourself, also in the case of addiction I'm not sure if 'choice' is the right word.
B) The government isn't forcing you to go into work though. Thats the thing. The government is trying to force you to give up an activity that makes you too sick to work, after that the decision whether to go in or not is up to you.
C) You make the baseless assertion that social engineering is automatically wrong. I guess I'm just an immoral bastard because I support taxation on addictive substances that are harmful to both individuals and society.








