By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fooflexible on 21 October 2007
Edit Thread
leo-j said:
starcraft said:
Way to screw around with my quote leo-j. I said GT does not look SUBSTANTIALLY better than FM2. And i'm right, it doesn't. GT looks very pretty, but it is not leaps and bounds ahead of FM2. If the PS3 was nearly as powerful as Sony says it is then GT, a first party game, would look far and away better than the Microsoft exclusive equivalent. But it's time to be honest with yourself leo. The PS3 is more powerful than the 360, but the difference is only marginal and massive amounts of the PS3's power are extremely difficult, if not impossible to harness for gaming purposes.

No shooter on the 360 looks nearly as good as killzone 2, but farcry 2.

No game looks as good as gran turismo 5, gameplay wise it IS leaps and bounds ahead of FM2.

Heavenly sword looks better than ANY action game on the xbox 360.

that is all I have to say...

 


 This coming from a guy who basically told us to ignore news from a site that comments too much on one system. Well you post mostly about the ps3, should we take your advise and ignore your comments?

 Those screenshots are not the highest quality, but I have to say they've gone a long way to create the closest comparison. I hate when games compare shots that are so remotely different from each other that it's apples to oranges.

 

Oh and about gt5 being leaps ahead of FM2's gameplay, first off have you played either game? second, even gt5 creators have said FM2 has way more gameplay options. So now who's biased?