Xoj said:
.jayderyu said:
Bethesda is better at DLC NOW than before. For anyone who doesn't remember there was indeed a time where Oblivion charged $2 for a horse skin.
@xoj
see I remember when the worst thing that companies could do to console gaming was having a HDD(not having the HDD) would cause having patches and sometimes buggy games. Of course people now over look that and find it acceptable. The bar moves. I still find patch fixes unacceptable of my console games.
DLC is the best thing that could happen to gaming. I know it sounds odd, but it's true. When you buy the game(if it's a bought model) then it must be a whole package. No silly $2 for costume colours. The add on pack must be noticible or really cheap for something noticible. The exrta income for an easier to develop expansion(mind you more work into making DLC doable) brings in more profit for the game, extends the life of the game which in turn keeps your interest for the next game.
Bethesda has learned what makes good DLC. kudos to them. |
should i blame microsoft them? Because they start the lets move PC hardware to consoles things.
they were the ones that starting using HDD =(.
DLC would be good if they actually given a damn about making new contend, they just repack things, and make you unlock it and it's already on the disc and should be there for free.
|
Come on man, that is pretty much ridiculous. You're talking of maybe .001% of all DLC out there. 99.999% of DLC is new and not on the disc.
