Xoj on 07 August 2009
| .jayderyu said: bah, there no "stealing" involved what soever. This is just bitter tears and whining. Sony started a new battle field by subsidizing game costs. It was a value of money that Sony had that Sega nor Nintendo could leverage to the same strength. PS fans became happy because it got them more games. Come MS who can throw around shits loads more money and now the same fans are calling the tactic "unfair". Who cares. I'll tell you what. This subsidising game companies is just gonna break the game industry. You can't have companies live on life support forever. Either the company is healthy and can function on their own or they are going to linger forever in the medical game hospital. It may seem like an odd anaology, but it's pretty darn accurate. wow I sound so darn heartless. Then again the employees of X company when goes under can go to another company, so game companies are in a better situation. |
sega maybe not, but nintendo also bought studios.
there is a differnet from paying and not doing something and helping developers but also taking part in the project aside being the publisher.
there is so small input in the games , that game like ninja gaiden 2 were published by microsoft and are being ported.
1. game can be ported, and they are.
2. whats naughty dog? polyphony? they are top rank.
3. sony invest millions in games, killzone 2 development was easily over 50 million and it shows, and thats form an "average" developer.
4. i think i will leave, better a quality console that will ast me for years, that good online that i won't be able to play because the console it's broken.
