Xoj said:
themanwithnoname said:
patapon said:
De85 said:
KungKras said:
Nightwish224 said:
Like I've stated before. If a company wants to spend money on the consumer to bring titles, then let them. We spend enough money on video games, why NOT allow this? It's fanboys who are the angry ones. Want the games right away? Get the right console. |
So companies being a pain in the ass to the people that own the "wrong" console is not bad?
|
To put it bluntly, no. What does Microsoft owe to Joe PS3 owner if Joe chooses not to support MS and the 360?
Answer: nothing whatsoever.
|
Your right, they don't owe anything to ps3 owners. But that's not the problem, it's what they take away... MS actively fucks over ps3 owners. Why would I choose to support them if I'm so disgusted by their unethical business practices?
I would be happy if they created a selection of 1st party offerings. But what do they do instead? They moneyhat not to have a game come out on the ps3 specifically. And thats bad in my book.
|
So tell me, if Sony were the ones doing the buying, would you be complaining about games not coming to the 360? Admit it...if Sony were doing it, you would be thrilled as would everyone else complaining about it.
|
i would care i can't stand the way american corporations work, seriously why anyone would it? microsoft don't, they like dirt in their name, they even say they do, 50 million for GTA4 DLC?, and breaking the bank for E3? which likely was Rising port?
|
That is the way things work in the business world. Microsoft does everything it can to get people to buy its exclusives and its versions of 3rd party games, whether it means it being a timed exclusive or having exclusive DLC. Why? Because it likes beating its competators, like just about every other business does.
