SciFiBoy said:
Viper1 said:
SciFiBoy said:
the first part i read, i still dont see how one could define Obama as a Facist, even if your merely using it as an insult, that just makes your post flamebait?
he is no where near being a social interventionist, please explain what eugenics he has been involved in, in what way is he commiting ethnic cleansing?
Hitler was a facist, to compare Obama to him, is just delusional and desperate, clearly you have some sort of irrational hatred of the man, otherwise, you wouldnt even bring up facism in the first place in relation to him.
|
I said mild didn't I? Did I say extreme? Why does everyone think of the worst case examples when looking at political and social capacities?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_interventionism
Try reading that.
|
isnt the stuff in the first paragraph good?
Social interventionism is an action which involves the intervention of a government or an organization in social affairs.[1] Such policies can include provision ofcharity or social welfare as a means to alleviate social and economic problems of people facing financial difficulties; provision of health care; provision of education; provision of safety regulations for employment and products; delivery of food aid or recovery missions to regions or countries negatively affected by an event; adoptionprograms; etc.
why would you object to thoose things?
also, how is Obama even a mild facist? can you back that up?
|
And why do you assume I'm saying it is a negative thing? Does your preconceived notions of those 3 words automatically incurr negative thoughts?
I said Fascist because Social Interventionism is a form Facism.
As Famousringo stated, Facism is a very broad spectrum and I simply wanted to see how many people would assign negative connotations to it wihout context.