Safeway has the healthcare answer, but government is in the way.

[Squilliam]

outlawauron said:

Squilliam said:

For example: Is it fair that a person who has a genetic predisposition to high blood pressure, heart disease etc be lumped into the same category as people who have these things due to the choices they make? What about a person who has a genetic predisposition to cancer but you can't measure it in your standardised health tests. Should the person whose condition is unmeasurable pay less than the person whos condition is manifested easily on a standard health checkup? So without going into peoples lives, where do you draw the line?

Of course it's not fair, but that's how life is. My car insurance is ridicoulous because I'm a male college student. It has nothing to do with my record, but basing off of circumstances I can not control.

Whether you can afford coverage for car insurance doesn't determine whether you live or die... Thats my concern here. Life isn't fair, but one of the reasons for socialised healthcare is that not everyone is dealt a fair hand in life. If someone could never get coverage because they are predisposed to illness then they may go without treatment entirely or without complete treatment.