By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kjj4t9rdad on 04 August 2009
Edit Thread
JaggedSac said:
kjj4t9rdad said:
It really comes down to one thing, if you want to chat with friends and use your console as a social networking tool LIVE is better, however, if you actually want to play games PSN is better. Untill LIVE uttillises dedicated servers like Sony does, it will always be inferior IMO. Peer to Peer connections are terrible compared to dedicated servers.

That is up to the developers.  If developers want to carry the cost of dedicated servers, nothing is stopping them.

If it is up to the developers, why doesn't M$ have any?  As far as I know there is only one (Battlefield 1943) and I've only heard that it had dedicated servers, I do not know for sure.  On the other side, most, if not all the PS3 exclusives are some type of dedicated server set up.

If it is up to the developers, you LIVE members should be screaming for this.  It is so much better, if you are not getting them you are missing out on a far better network than what you are used to.  After all, you are paying for what is supposed to be a premier network service, it at least should offer more than one game with the best network set up.