Kasz216 on 02 August 2009
| MontanaHatchet said: Whatever he believed, he broke the law. He didn't care for his daughter whom he had legal responsibility for. We're not arguing morality or intent. This is a legal case, so we're arguing what the law is. Faith based healing isn't against the law, but it certainly doesn't work. And what is against the law is not taking someone for care when you have legal responsibility over them. Letting her die an easily preventable death is certainly against the law. Maybe you'd have a case with a better analogy, but you don't. |
Faith based healing isn't illegal... but using it is illegal if someone dies?
Wouldn't that make it.... illegal?
Why aren't people who refuse vacinations arrested and thorwn in jail for 25 years when their kids die?
