Sqrl on 01 August 2009
| Final-Fan said: On the other hand, he says that the report of the NIPCC, which I believe Sqrl mentioned, can be summed up as claiming "that global warming probably isn’t happening; if it is happening, it’s not due to human activity; and, besides, a “warmer world will be a safer and healthier world for humans and wildlife alike.”" If true, this appears on the surface to be scattershot FUD. And in particular I would say that the third claim is the one I am most skeptical of. |
FUD is sort of one of those non-specific things though - what specifically do they get wrong?
This is the issue with the pro-AGW side of the debate recently - they work harder to discredit the source than they do to actually address the points being made. I mean your own assessment admits that you are going from "appearances" from the "surface". I mean I appreciate that you might no have the time to read a nearly 900 page document but to just call it FUD and be done is itself just that. FUD.
 |
| To Each Man, Responsibility |
