ymeaga1n said:
machinegunmike said:
Squilliam said:
A 10 year lifespan is a function of consumer acceptance. Only winning consoles from any generation can be sure to achieve this, the PS3 is not the winning console.
There have been no substantiated rumours of any Xbox 360 replacement. Also statements from Microsoft directly contradict any idea that you can say that 2011 will be the year a new Xbox will be released. However there have been semi-substantiated rumours of an additional 4 hardware revisions which imply otherwise so with no evidence to support an earlier release and a little evidence to support a later release you'd have to go with the later release for now.
So in short, you have belief rather than proof or even evidence on your side.
If my belief is = to your belief then if I believe something to the opposite of what you believe does that not cancel it out?
|
I guess you missed the part where i said that it only has to sell 10millions units a year starting next year at 300$ps3 slim for only 5years
to reach 75million ps3s sold, Whats so hard to belive in that?
And just because microsoft released a statement about how long the 360 will last doesnt make it true,
These are the same people who said that the 360 only had 16%failure rate when infact it had 33% failure rate.
|
machinegunmike said:
....
Thats 25Million sold in just 3 years at an averge price of (500$ a console)
And the ps3 has 10years in it just like PS2 and PS1 did and maybe more.
As soon as the slim 300$ PS3 releases late this year or early next year along with alot of exclusives like GT5,god of war3,uncharted 2,heavy rain and many more its going to sell like crazy.
....
|
Anyone else smell the irony?
|
The difference is sony has already proved that they commit to 10 year plan, while microsoft lied about the failure rate.
Not to mention that no one knew about the xbox 360 until 6 month before it released.
