| ManusJustus said: Just for people's information, this is a chemistry and engineering society, and those people make a lot of money polluting and extracting resources. These people are bias, and asking them their opinion on global warming would be like asking an author who makes money selling global warming books about his view on global warming. |
This is the definition of generic ad hominem. Do you have nothing better to do than insult and impune the integrity of people with generic and non-specific claims?
Can you give even one specific example regarding any of these scientist?
And for the record it is a Society with members who have expertise in physics, climatology, geophysics, etc... I'd also point out that the publication has been historically a big supporter of AGW and then "climate change". Were they trustworthy before and only now have they decided to be greedy liars?
edit: I'd also add that your definition of bias includes all scienstis who put forth pro-AGW reasearch and views as well. Most scientist recieve their research grants from parties with interests in the field. The default assumption is that a scientist has integrity and provides legitimate results until they have violated that trust. This is why you have reproducible experiments as part of the scientific method.
 |
| To Each Man, Responsibility |
