perpride said:
Graves said:
perpride said:
Graves said:
perpride said:
Graves said:
Good for Sony, it'll surpass the PS1 and PS2 in no time. |
/thread.
It's not exactly a good thing that it took PS3 this long to (almost) hit 24 million. Still, for a console who people thought would not make it to 2008, especially considering it is still at a very high pricepoint, this is not bad news.
|
You act like the console has been a success since 2008. Sony keeps pissing money away in hopes the system doesn't look like a failure. |
Success is hardly the word. But I am saying that it can no longer be called a failure. It is about to hit 24 mill and soon pass Xbox, and this is still at $400 a pop. It has much room to grow if anything, especially with hardware development costs coming down. The console also has a stellar library of games and is recieving quite a bit of great third party support.
|
Well that's fantastic! I'm sure Sony's ultimate goal was to outsell the original Xbox, come in dead last this gen, and lose all the profits from the PS2. Sony actually hurt the Playstation brand and allowed Microsoft to grow. How is it not a failure?
It still may be getting 3rd party support but it doesn't get all the exclusives like previous Playstation consoles and its not the primary software mover. I get it, you're fanboy and if the PS3 had a vagina you would marry it. But this console is a complete and utter failure.
|
Did you read a single word I wrote? I'm not gonna report you for trolling, but for gods sake at least read my damn post. |
Just because I didn't touch on everything you said doesn't mean I didn't read it. Okay let me respond to what I didn't comment on...
Development cost is also coming down on the Wii and 360. So the PS3 will always be the most expensive.
The steller 1st party library probably isn't generating much of profit. Especially considering most of their sales come from bundles.
The other points I did touch on.
