CGI-Quality said:
Lightning_24 said:
RAZurrection said:
Lightning_24 said:
I know he is this great developer programer or whatever (actually i don't know i never heard of him but that doesn't take away from who he is) But if he is this great guy shouldn't he be able to do better than first party programers that work on PS3 and can get their games at 60fps like i think God of War III is going to be running at it but i don't know about uncharted. This is only a question i don't mean to start anything.
|
god of war 3 has a "variable" framerate, uncharted is 30fps
Rage is an openworld 60FPS shooter with split-screen and better graphics than both of those titles. You should be asking how a third party cross platform game is going to dance the ballero on those games visuals...but the answer is simple; He's Jon Carmack. It's what he does.
|
Really, better graphics than uncharted? Is there a video of gameplay or ingame screen shots? I've seen some screen shots that looked good but were they all in game? And can we see footage of how the game is going to look now?
|
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/quake-con-rage/38582
Check that link bro, some footage in there of it.
|
And that's footage from 2008... the game can only look better.
OT: I find the article odd, considering the game was supposed to take 4dvds. Also Carmack seemed like he wanted to make an engine that ran the same on each console... and would even compress the textures to fit the X360, and have equivalent compression on the PS3 so that the console versions were similar. It could be possible that the article said that the PS3 version would take up an eqivalent 4 dvds, but they compressed it to 2 for X360, which would mean less compressed textures vs. higher FPS?
PC version doesn't count since that's variable depending on your set-up anyway...
