CGI-Quality said:
*sigh* Let's try again.... Ok....... A. how do you know The Getaway would have been successful? You don't. You'tre putting your personal feelings in with what could/or could not have happened. B. There reason why I say I don't get you is because, if YOU don't like a service, how does that affect everyone else? If you don't like HOME, it has no bearing on me, so how does it affect everybody? I didn't mention HOME making money either, so take that up with whoever mentioned it. In fact, my point has been crystal clear from the get go. What YOU see as a poor investment is your opinion, not a fact. For your statements to be true of the money they invested, you'd have to know the amount. Since you, (nor I) don't, that's moot. C. You can call me blind, dumb, stupid whatever, I'm used to being labeled on here. It doesn't change the issue at hand. HOME is not something you HAVE to use, and if you don't like it, stay away from it. That's what you're failing to do, it's not a service you have to use, why complain....? |
Sorry for the long response time, my parents have just got back from Hong Kong.
A) I used The Getaway as an example, I also mentioned spending more on marketing.
B) I know it's my opinion, that's assumed by the fact that I said it. If it weren't opinions, there'd be no point in debating the issues - you can't debate facts. But I will say this: it doesn't matter if we don't know exact figures - we can assume that the cost is in the millions by virtue of the fact that most projects this generation has a cost in the millions, and that the money could have seen a much greater return if it was spent on, say, marketing, or signing some exclusive contracts on large IPs (exclusive maps on MW2 would see a huge boost in sales, for example).
C) At what point did I say that I have to use Home? I'm complaining because I feel (see, I've now got to start putting in extra words so that readers know that it's my opinion) that I, as a consumer, would have benefited more if Sony had put their resources elsewhere. I don't understand how you can "fail" to see my point. I'm not debating the service itself (I can't stand it, but that's not what I'm debating), I'm arguing that Sony would have been wise (or wiser) to invest elsewhere.