joeorc said:
SamuelRSmith said:
joeorc said:
SamuelRSmith said:
I can't agree to disagree on this, because I seriously feel that this was a massive waste of money on Sony's behalf.
And although it could be making a profit, now (nobody knows, - it was in development for a large amount of time, and requires quite an extensive architecture - also, Sony's been quite quiet on numbers since that $1,000,000 in a week - could have died quickly), there's no denying that if that money had been invested elsewhere, it could have been returning more of a profit for Sony. |
there's no denying that if that money had been invested elsewhere, it could have been returning more of a profit for Sony.
In you OPINION...!
you may not agree to disagree on this , but I will agree to dissagree with you on this. I understand you feel very strong in your Opinion on HOME and nothing wrong with at. but on the same token you are going to find people that do not share your Opinion on Home .
Just as you would find people that do share your Opinion on Home and they would agree with you and there are people I am sure in the forum that indeed agree with you on your point's. I on the other hand do not.
so I am sorry you feel that way about Home and since you are not required to USE Home I would not use Home If I was you because it seem's to be getting you a little hot under the collar stress is not good for anyone esp. gamer's.
|
Heh, I'm not getting stressed, debating is what I do best. Hence why 90% of my posts are made in political threads, and I rarely venture into gaming threads, anymore.
But debating is essentially what forums are about - all this "agree to disagree" works well in real life, but on a forum, it quickly turns things into some kind of arse-patting group, and a niggling curiosity for homo-erotism aside, that's not really where I want to spend my free time.
|
so I gather this is more about creating a debate on the viability of Home vs' what Sony should have done instead of putting resources toward home?
I think if you had that it was a debate in the topic you would not have had so many passive post's
|
Yeah, you're right about where I'm going with this.
The reason why my initial posts were so empty to start with was because I was expecting to be ignored/not having worthwhile coming back at me.
