HappySqurriel said:
Whenever you're dealing with the classification of something where there is no "solid" characteristics that are used to determine how to group things together it becomes very much open to debate ... and even the designer of something doesn't have a more authoritative opinion on the matter. The Cell processor lacks the ability to handle shader effects at a decent level, which means that it can not really be classified as a GPU in the modern sense. From what I have seen, you have as large (or larger) agenda of anyone in this thread, and you seem unwilling to listen to other people who have a better understanding of how processors work, what is important, and how to classify them. Your opinion is so trapped in the marketing and hype surrounding the Cell that you can not accept that it is not amazingly powerful when it comes to being a CPU for a videogame console. |
o'l please your trying to claim your OPINION on something is more correct than the people with PHD's who ONCE again designed the D@MN CHIP..YEA GOTCHA.
yea because the Cell cannot handle shader effects at a decent level that make's it not a GPU..god that's like saying because 3 cycle engine is not as fast as a v8 is not an engine.. yea gotcha
better understanding of how processor's work...OK you program for what type of processor's.? and your the end all be all on all type's of processor's.
My AGENDA..my AGENDA please if anyone has AGENDA'a it's the people such as your self you have no problem in asking for proof what something is but when it's posted you then come out and say well that's not what it need's to be classified as. Even when it's 100% proof + that it is. it is you and other's that are clear on their AGENDA

I AM BOLO
100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...
ps:
Proud psOne/2/3/p owner. I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.







