hellonearth said:
Bursche said:
hellonearth said:
Bursche said:
Get over it. Its a Novel to Movie transition, and just like any other ones (Harry Potter, Narnia, Twilight) you get a better experience and understand if you read the novel. That being said, if you read the novel, while you would understand the movie fully, you wouldn't be awe inspired by it either because its a direct transition except for the ending.
But by your criticism, it just seems like you're an immature moviegoer who expected the next Dark Knight. |
I had no expectations really. I went to the store to rent a movie and figured Id rent it.
Immature moviegoer? Please. Save your pety little insults for someone who cares. Read professional critics reviews and they are bashing this movie even worse than I am.
|
Read your criticisms. You complained about the sex scenes, the lack of superpowers, the movie length (which was actually perfect due to the immense story), and had only "10 minutes of special effects". I can see not understanding the story since many things were left out, but the basic premise should have still been seen and appreciated, but your critique is very superficial.
|
lol well the comment on the nude scenes isnt superficial. It's a legit critisism of the movie.
Seriously, who did the directors think was going to watch the movie? Mostly males aged 16-35. What made them think that we'd want to see a naked male? It's not like it's just a quick 2 second shot that people can shake off. They blatantly show his glowing blue cock for a long period of time to a point where you have to look away from the screen.
|
Maybe the directors didn't realize you'd be so traumatized by seeing a penis. Perhaps if it was erect and flopping around I would agree.
By the way... don't watch Bruno. You might miss the comedy because you're too concerned about seeing a penis.
