SciFiBoy said:
Kasz216 said:
SciFiBoy said:
Kasz216 said:
Yeah... it doesn't make sense to have a school that can only be used by a certain subset of the people paid for by the government.
Outside of like.... special education schools. Still... when your government is more liberal with what government should be obligated to provide.
|
imo, the government is obliged to provide everyone with the option of education to get a job, everyone includes people of any faith or indeed no faith.
|
Shouldn't you be for faith based schools then? What if ones faith says that one must learn from a respected member of their religion?
To say "they're being picky they should just go to regular schools" is not really giving them an option.
|
you misunderstoood, sorry
any place of educaiton should be for everyone imo, faith schools preclude certain people, so would be against that, so i oppose them strongly.
do you understand now?
if they can prove to me that there religon is based upon facts and that failing to do so will definetley result in them being punished by there deity, yes, till then, no.
|
That's a pretty tall order... and one you don't hold a lot of other government run programs to.
For example National Healthcare. There are no facts that prove it's a good idea, no data to suggest it's really helpful etc.
National Healthcare is provided by the UK because the people of England believe healthcare is something everyone should have.
This is not based on any fact.
Almost nothing in this world is proven by "facts" and even then many things that are proven by what are thought to be facts are later overturned.
The fact that democracy is the best government in general isn't even based on a fact. There is no reason we should have one over a dictatorship or oligarchy or anything else. Outside of it being a prefrence with no facts.
