akuma587 said:
They are doing a good deal of #1, at least in terms of allowing Medicare and other government run programs to have more flexibility in what they will and won't pay for. And a public option would be a price control on private insurance companies. #2 kind of falls over into the realm of what social security disability already does. And it would be a bureaucratic nightmare to make some of these determinations rather than just have you get coverage at a certain age. A simpler solution would just be to give insurance companies less ability to price discriminate based on your individual medical history. #3 is definitely a good thing, and this is something that Congress is trying to implement. A lot of states have already done it. |
1) That's not what everyone on Capital hill says. Afterall that's a big reason why nobody wants to pass it. The system is modeled after the Massachuses Healthcare plan... which is currently falling apart... proving to be hugely expensive and only benefiting insurance companies.
2) There is a problem with making it so insurance companies can't price discriminate.
I thought that was possible until I ran into Dental Insurance.
I wanted to pick up Dental insurance since i grind my teeth in my sleep. However what they do with Dental insurance is you pay today... and they provide insurance a 6-motns to a year from now. They delay coverage like that because they couldn't survive otherwise.
Basically because people get cavaties... then they buy Dental insruance for a month or two. Get the surgery done and cancel.
3) Indeed that should be country wide.








