Why?

[SciFiBoy]

MontanaHatchet said:

SciFiBoy said:

MontanaHatchet said:
SciFiBoy, you're missing the part in your sentence where you're supposed to have a topic.

Example:

"The big tree."

If it were correct, it would be:

"The big tree fell over, destroying the house and spreading leaves everywhere."

So what's your point?

there is no proof of religion, therefore, religon has no more rights or privledges than any other belief system

is that topical enough for you?

Yes, there is proof of religion. Look right now at the Vatican. Look at a nation formed solely on a religious basis. Look at the pilgrimage to Mecca. Look at the churches, synagogues, mosques, and other houses of religion all over the world. And if you mean that there's no evidence that these religious beliefs are real, who cares? You're making an issue out of absolutely nothing. Things like Democracy are just concepts too, should we not hold that to any higher importance than of an Oligarchy or Despotism? Currency is just a concept, so is our economy, our language, etc. They are all things we believe in.

You're not getting the point here, and it's frustrating me. If there's ever an organized religion for fairies and dragons with millions of followers and a set belief system/doctrine, maybe their opinions will be protected. Otherwise, stop being difficult and use a little logic.

my point is that, until we can prove that a religons beliefs are factual, we cant give them any more credence than someone who thinks dragons are real.

i dont understand what youre saying? democracy and religon are not the same thing?