| blink182 said: Loads of good opinions guys, so it seems that there's still a divide, if you can call it that, between plasma and lcd users, i think personally myself i prefer the bright vibrant colours of lcd more than the natural pallette of plasma but that panasonic plasma recomended to me earlier sounds lovely, as much as 200hz sounds appealing even just 100hz leaves me feeling a bit queasy when watching sonething in motion so i suppose i've got a lot to consider. What does everyone think to the tv i stated in my op, sadly my browser (google chrome) won't let me post links for some reason?? |
Well, I use google chrome and don't have problem with posting sites. Well, the TV in the OP is a good choice of led tvs, really well quoted by the review site I posted. I stay with plasma because of natural pallette, price, black-levels, response time and motion resolution of true 1080p. I want to get a 32 inch full hd lcd to use as monitor for my gaming PC. And for you that is going to use to play the input lag is almost no existable. But the best tip i can give you is, get YOURS equipament and go to the store and ask to test in the TVs in an ambient that have near the same condition you'll have in your home and see what is best for you. I stay with plasma Panasonic G10 anyway because of 600hz sub-field that give us 1080p motion resolution.
