ironman said:
|
There are almost no 100% monopolies anymore but there are situations so close as considered to be a monopoly in business terms.
Some tiny alternatives that are not even made generally available don't count in business terms. For the general consumer there is 1 choice - Windows OS - when buying a PC. Linux, etc. are only being used by a tiny number of users making a specific choice. Mac OS doesn't count as that is only on another platform.
Since IBM dropped OS2 MS has enjoyed an essential monopoly on OS. Splitting hairs because a few technical folks install Linux doesn't change that - nor change the power MS has wielded on the basis of their position.
Even with the Google annoucement that is only specific to certain tech - netbooks. Until there is a viable OS for PCs, laptops, etc. MS enjoys all the privilages of a monopoly and is rightly viewed by the majority of people of having a monopoly - or, if you do want to spilt hairs, to have a virtual monopoly - i.e. so close as to make no difference.
Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...







