meh, I almost had interest in debating this but I forgot how this works. Person A Ignore %99 of what person B says, attack some largely irrelevant nuance of their post, then add some other stuff that wasn't even being discussed, then person C comes in and makes vague assertions ignore 90% of what persons A and B were discussing.

You can find me on facebook as Markus Van Rijn, if you friend me just mention you're from VGchartz and who you are here.









