By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

WarHwak is quite similar to Battlefield 1943.  After playing a lot Battlefield 1943, I realize WarHwak is a lot more complete and mature... and graphics are similar.

Waht I liked on Battlefield 1943 are controls and how eazy is to start playing, the learning curve is a lot better than WarHawk, like milions times, I just played for 15 minutes Battlefield 1943 and was "in" the team.... On WarHawk I had like 3 ours to start plaiyng not so bad..

BUT when talking about buy... WarHawk in long term has more playable value, one time you get grid of just learning and dying.

Congrat´s to DICE engine, really good. WarHawk when lauched was crappy, then got so many updates, now it´s impecable and with a lot of DLC.

Sooooo... get both and take your conclusions... I will play more Battlefield 1943, but I see in one week will get back to WarHawk.

Sorry about my MESSY, DIRTY, terrible english, I am not drunk, I don´t know english.



PSN: franco-br
MGS4, GH, MW2, GT5p, WipeoutHD, etc..etc..