By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kanariya said:
JaggedSac said:
NJ5 said:
I am not going to argue that night racing and weather changes aren't necessary. I will just say that comparing Forza 3 to other simpler games which had those features is very unfair.

Why? Because Forza 3 aims to be a much more realistic game than those other games. It's not hard to implement half-assed weather changes which don't correctly change the physics. It's much harder to do it correctly with realistic physics, which is how Turn 10 would want to do it if they had the budget/time for it.

My point? Compare Forza 3 to GT5 all you want, but don't criticize Forza 3 for not having features that simpler games have.

Yep.

 

So a definitive racing sim of the gen means they don't have time/budget to include extra features.

Or the extra features are too hard for them?

That's been PD's excuse all these years, looks like it will have to fly for Turn 10 too.  Come back smack talking when you:

1. Get a release date for GT5

2. Get confirmation that GT5 includes more features than FM3

3. Have actually played FM3 and realised what a GT fanboy you are that will blinker you from playing another great sim racer.

 

Just for the supposed car fanatics criticizing FM3, Alex Wurz, a driver with quite a bit of talent reckons the physics engine is the best available to the commercial market having played the game.  Given AW has driven on the McLaren simulator too I'd suggest his opinion holds more weight than all of you especially, given he has actually played the game unlike the rest of you haters.