Samus Aran said:
d21lewis said:
Lolcislaw said:
Good line-up
But now compare it to whats available on the VC... its no contest VC > XBLA |
I respectfully disagree. Much of what's on XBLA are enhanced versions of games on the VC. And much of what's on the VC is, for lack of a better word, vintage crap. Some of these games that I enjoyed as a youth haven't aged well at all. The VC caters to nostalgia buffs, but they really need to update some of their classics. Most XBLA games are either totally original or are classic games that updated for a new gen.....and still throw in the older version, too. The biggest thing that the VC has going for it is that its the only place for Nintendo classics.
My opinion.
|
Why would anyone want an enhanced version of a classic game? You buy those games for nostalgia not for the graphics... VC just has a lot more games then XBLA. I guess it's just me, but I really don't understand why anyone would want enhanced graphics if they're playing a classic game from there youth.---> My opinion
And the fact that VC has nintendo classics makes it an insta win already tbh.--> That's just my opinion ofcourse.
With all that said, XBLA and VC are far superior then PSN.---> Fact
I guess if you want enhanced graphics on everything and ruin it in some(not all) cases(TMNT for example) then XBLA is going to be your favorite. If you don't want that, and I think a lot of people don't want that, then VC is going to be your favorite.---> Conclusion
That's my opinion on it. Two different opinions, but let's just respect that.
|
Yeah, I don't want graphical upgrades on classic games. It seems like they just ripped the soul out of TMNT.
Essay Pro