akuma587 said:
All time high in actual numbers, not as a percentage. The country's population has grown a lot since this data started being measured, so your point really isn't relevant. And the reason why it is important that jobs are being lost at a slower pace is because that is how economic trends typically work. As NJ5 was pointing out, things just don't change overnight. It took people about six months to a year to even figure out we were even in a recession in the first place. |
One thing you don't seem to get is that the slower pace is not significant ...
If we were talking about the economy losing jobs at 1/4 or 1/2 of the peak rate you might be able to make the claim that there has been a significant improvement in the economy and 6 months down the road the economy will start creating jobs at a faster rate than it is losing jobs. When you are talking about the economy bleeding jobs at 90% of the peak rate its kind of hard to argue that the economy has improved as much as companies have run out of "low lying branches" to cut and are being more selective with their layoffs.
When you factor in people who are asked to take pay cuts, asked to work fewer hours, or taken part time jobs to get some reliable income into the mix (who are all hurting but don't show up in the main unemployment statistics) its hard to look at the economy bleeding 550,000 jobs in a month rather than 600,000 as being a huge improvement.







