By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Khuutra said:
SciFiBoy said:
Khuutra said:

You misunderstood. The point is that if the movies don't make their argument for you, nobody is going to be able to explain why they're great, because their virtues cannot be made apparent to you. It's not like "If you don't like this then you have no taste", it's more "if you don't like this, I don't know what to tell you".

And I can take all this higgledy piggledy about the characters and even the music, but by what metric could the animation possibly be considered "meh"? Do we have different understandings of what those words mean when strung together in that order?

it means i thought the animation was ok, seen better, seen worse, i thought that was obvious, lol.

Yeah, I'm asking you to qualify it. In what way could that animation be improved? Just from an aesthetic perspective, in what sense is it lacking? Where have you seen better in that style, exactly? How can you possibly consider it middle of the road? What perspective do you have where that kind of judgement is considered legitimate?


just how it looks to me, i like the animation in The Simpsons and anime i watch better, is that a crime now?

as for how qualified i am to make that judgement, as were talking asthetics, surely, there is no-one better qualified than myself to judge what i do or dont like?

edit: if youre implying that my opinion is worthless and invalid, then i have two words for you, one of which is off.