Steroid said:
nightsurge said:
Steroid said:
nightsurge said:
Steroid said:
Bzzz wrong! 8 vs. 8 might have been better in the Dreamcast era but here in 2009 PSN wipes the floor with XBL. |
Nice of you to inform me of you being wrong before making your incorrect post.
Neither PSN nor XBL is responsible for how many players can be supported. That's a developer decision. XBL can support just as many gamers via dedicated servers as PSN can. XBL has a few games which use dedicated servers already: Frontline: Fuel of War, Left 4 Dead, EA games, BF1943 now. So you see, it is not a limitation of XBL at all  Glad I could educate you on this matter.
|
Why don't you educate me about any online FPS for 360 that even has 1/4 the amount of players on a map that Mag does.
You might be right it may not be XBL it could simply be that the 360 just can't handle it. ;)
|
I'm sorry, I was under the impression that MAG was not released yet. Tell me how it does after it is released, would you?
Oh and you are wrong again. The 360 is not limited either. It's simply a developer decision. Ever wonder why games that are made for 4v4, 6v6, 8v8 sell many more copies than games that are 32v32 or 30v30? Because the audience is much larger and that's why developers are targetting it instead.
And would you quit using winks? Everyone knows you aren't actually kidding 
|
You know Huxly got cancelled for 360 for tecnical issues right? ;D
|
Drop it both of you please, I have a huge headache today and my niceness will only go so far.
