TheSteve said:
Steroid said:
nightsurge said:
Steroid said:
Bzzz wrong! 8 vs. 8 might have been better in the Dreamcast era but here in 2009 PSN wipes the floor with XBL. |
Nice of you to inform me of you being wrong before making your incorrect post.
Neither PSN nor XBL is responsible for how many players can be supported. That's a developer decision. XBL can support just as many gamers via dedicated servers as PSN can. XBL has a few games which use dedicated servers already: Frontline: Fuel of War, Left 4 Dead, EA games, BF1943 now. So you see, it is not a limitation of XBL at all  Glad I could educate you on this matter.
|
Why don't you educate me about any online FPS for 360 that even has 1/4 the amount of players on a map that Mag does.
You might be right it may not be XBL it could simply be that the 360 just can't handle it. ;)
|
Yeah, Mag is great, it... oh, wait... That game isn't out yet.
Why don't YOU educate me about any game for Sony that has half as many players as Halo 7?
|
Halo 7.. Will that be running on the Halo 2 engine as well?
