Skeeuk said:
selnor said:
Unclean said:
selnor said:
Unclean said:
selnor said:
GT5 has to mix it up with the likes of LFS on PC or GTR2 in the sim part to get anywhere close to Forza 3 as a driving sim. This is my point. No amount of weather, supposedly more cars is gonna change this fact.
|
Can i borrow your time machine? You've obviously played both games alot. Or are you just butthurt by the fact that the ''definitive'' racer this gen lacks weather?
|
No the fact that an actual Racing website SimRacing said GT5 P was not as realistic as Forza 2 says enough.
|
That's cool and I agree. Forza 2 is a full game, GT5p is not even a demo.
Still, it's impossible for you to know that forza 3 is going to be a better sim than gt5.
|
I agree that we need to play both new games. But I use facts we already know to make some early prediction.
Forza 1 2005 vs GT4 2005. Forza 1 was more realistic, and scored higher.
GT4P and GT4 are almost identical in handling and graphics. Just loads more content than the Prologue.
So I can assume the same with GT5P and GT5. We already know that Forza 3 has improved greatly on Forza in the driving department. Media tells us so.
|
utterly wrong analysis.
gt4 is a clearly better game than gt3, but gt4 scored lower than gt3, reason being is brought more of the same(going of reviews) 96 vs 89
when forza 1 came out it brought more innovation hence it was scored higher than gt4, so if your claiming scores, gt3 must be better than forza 1?
but gt4 is better than gt3 regardless of scores, with a much much bigger game and more gameplay. its a superior game to forza 1, although forza 1 was a good game.
|
I believe your analogy is wrong. Any game before GT4 was reviewed highly because it was alone. There was no Forza then. GT4 however had to compete with Forza. And Forza came out on top. GT4 was given it's scores becuase Forza was there that year and a better more realistic game.
So yes GT4 is better than GT3, but GT4 had competition, hence it not getting as high scores.
