ManusJustus on 09 July 2009
| Viper1 said: No, I didn't imply that ALL cats see in the dark, I implied that cats CAN see in the dark. The emphasis is the difference and why the premise still holds. The fallacy is on the reader to assume which is emphasized as most will assume ALL not CAN. |
You implied that all cats see in the dark, you tried to make the connection that since Midnight was a cat then Midnight could see in the dark, hence all cats see in the dark.
That premise in invalid, just as several people here have explained.
