It's quite funny, or should I say hypocritical, to lecture about logic and premises when that person(Manus) stated the premise "things made up don't exist". It's entirely possible that something made-up happens to be true in reality, without the person knowing it. Actually, there's also a frequent area that this happens in. This is rather interesting and falls into psychology, but a lot of made-up stories with a lot of thought put into making it actually end up being true, because everyone unconsciously learns information and sometimes we later think about it without really remembering that we learned it and think it's our original idea. It's unlikely than an entire made-up story from beginning to end is actually true, but multiple parts could be, But anyway.
you're both basically saying the same thing. It's a logical curveball but you have to reformat your statement because of it ; "cats can see in the dark" to something like "cats typically have the ability to see in the dark" which is true, and so the premise is now ok and the logic can be determined.
