wholikeswood on 09 July 2009
| ZenfoldorVGI said: Well, despite the fact that the game is missing some aesthetic features, everyone here completely misses the point of a "game." It's like making a thread laughing because Miyamoto announced that Link couldn't jump in OOT, unless a ledge allowed it. Until we see the game, we really will have no idea if this matters at all. Truth, the most terrible racing game in the world could have night racing, and it would still be the most terrible racing game. The best racing game could lack car damage, and it would still be the best racing game. This will be completely overblown by every Sony fanboy in this thread. They have made GT their last Golden Cow this generation, and the last best hope for their console making a turnaround. Forza 3 is a threat to that. Obviously, they must attack it with all the zeal they can muster. Is anything I've said a lie? Please, stop the party. It's pathetic. |
Downplay this news as much as you wish, but that particular line is complete garbage.
I mean, rallying and night options I'd accept most people could grumble about and live without reasonably happily, but lack of weather is really quite a significant omission.
Weather is a staple part of racing sims, and after all selnor's talk of tyre deformation and track detail, it's irrefutable that this major component's absence will be sorely lamented, since effects like weather and sleet have a huge effect on racing conditions.
It's not a gamebreaker, but it certainly reduces Forza 3's scope.
