By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Akvod on 08 July 2009
Edit Thread
Slimebeast said:
Akvod said:
Slimebeast said:
Akvod said:
Slimebeast said:

WHat I love is 1843 game is it has open world maps, total freedom, much like the incredible Enemy Territory: Quake Wars.

Terrible with only 12 vs 12 players though 1943, that sux.

I hope MAG will be very open world too. 256 players in the same warfield - amazing!!

Bad Company had open maps too, had destructible environments, more classes, and looks like better graphics.

I'm sad that Bad Company 2 won't have more players than 1, but the destructible environments are going to be AWESOME. In Bad Company, the destructible environments were like sprites, walls broke the same exact way and after a while, you can actually predict how a wall or roof will break after you shoot there.

 


Interesting, because from the screens of BF 1943 it looks like it's the same way, the destruction is 'false' in that buildings fall down and breaks in predictable patterns. I hate that.

But maybe the upgraded engine for Frostbyte, like u say Bad company 2 will be a lot better.

 

 

Holy crap did that look good! Not only the destruction but i didnt know Bad Company 2 would be open-world and have multiplayer, plus the grafix were great! (now dont tell me the console versions will look much worse and have no multiplayer)

I think that was the 360 footage. TBH, I don't think the graphics were that much of an improvement from the first game. The E3 trailer you saw (I'll post it at the end of the post) is pretty much how the first game looks, only a bit more polished. I am stunned at the micro destruction though, and the level of detail it contains, but I don't think that's necessarily better graphics. I'll say it's better animation.

Bad Company, which I don't think has even been released on PC (I remember some talk/announcements, but I don't think it ever materialized) has always been open world (for Conquest, but Gold Rush only keeps getting bigger and bigger as each crate gets destroyed. However, it doesn't do much since the spawn points get moved closer and closer).

I'm really surprised and kinda dissapointed at the lack of knowledge on Bad Company, especially since it seems like the more you find out, the more you're pleasently surprised and happy about it.

Bad Company always had 24 players (dissapointed that Bad Company 2 will still contain the same ammount). It always had destructible environments. It always had good graphics. It always had vehicles. It always had huge open maps.

1943, is alright for being a cheap DL game. But I think that aside from its price point, it's only a gimped down version of Bad Company 1 in a different setting. And since Bad Company 1 is cheap, that the price point of 1943 is something not worth caring about. I am surprised at the similarity between 43 and Bad Company though. But that also means that PC fans should be dissapointed, because 43 isn't really a sequel of 42, but a spin off of the console Battlefield (Bad Company).