By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Facher, wow, I know how you feel where the person on the opposite side is incapable of understanding the argument at hand. Words of Wisdom, let me try to simplify it for you.

OP said <snip>


I started to respond to your whole post until I noticed you didn't even bother to realize the OP isn't the poster in question.

Sorry, your topic is in another castle.  Try again.


WoW:  It was never an objective to prove anything other than grandmaster192 was using immature reasonins to back up his unfactual statements.  YOU took my statements as hard concrete without ever taking them as rersponses to gm192, and I honestly can't see anything other than that, unless you can explain it to me (hence a constructive debate (not argument)) on a (hopefully) educated forum.


Not my problem.  You were supposed to explain why they were "unfactual."  At this point the best you seem to be doing is insulting them.  Rol managed to present more solid arguments in one post than you have in all of yours combined.

Go out, debate with some other people, pit your ideas against theirs, and come back with a few more levels under your belt.


FYI, constructive debates are supported with attempts at evidence, citation, and un-biased statements.  I will certainly include sarcasm, such as my meeting 68,286 people who hate the XBox 360, just because I can type it, as long as users on this forum take it as fact.


Except that your posts exude bias like blood from a severed artery especially in regards to the possibility of someone disliking Nintendo brand video games/characters.  Rather than attempt to pretend to have an unbiased argument, you should acknowledge bias where you see it and understand its flaws.