SciFiBoy said:
starcraft said:
SciFiBoy said:
That Guy said:
Why does britian still have a royal family?
I thought you guys were all democratic and stuff now the Parliamentary System. What exactly does the Queen/Prince/etc. etc. do? Do they just sit there and collect public money? It seems like a drain on the economy to me.
|
a question i ask many of my countrymen and women, yet none of them have yet provided me with an answer that i deem acceptable.
the monarchy is antiquated, pointless, undemocratic and a waste of taxpayers money, i say were abolish the monarchy immediatley.
|
The Monarchy isn't a waste of taxpayers money at all. Have you any idea the sort of trade benefits, charitable benefits and other various benefits brought to the UK each year by diplomatic missions from Royal family members? They FAR outweigh the costs of running the royal house.
Thats before we even look at the benefits of having a united figurehead.
|
trade? trade is dealt with by the government isnt it? charity? charitys and run idependently and not for profit, dont see how theyre relevant to the monarchy, unless of course youre saying the monarchy have charitys that are funded by the state, which makes them not charitys but state initiatives. what other various benefits? diplomacy is again primarily done by the government, as it should be. as i mentioned, tourism is not her, so much as its the historic sites and stuff, wether she is there or not is unlikely to have any majour impact on tourism.
again, as ive said time and time agian, not a united figurehead, never been elected so you cant say that, till there is an election, she is not uniting anyone.
|
Trade is dealt with by the entire public and private sectors. Prince Charles in particular is regularly sent as a diplomatic ambassador too establish trade partnerships and reduce trade barriers with other nations.
